still fighting the AR 190-56
February 2, 2008
By shawn m. janson
police officer
Local 2104
yuma, AZ
Still fighting the AR 190-56.
We just lost a vp of the union due to an argument with management (he just walked out). Things are getting pretty bad here. Management is still pressing the AR 190-56. Some of are guys have already had failed the phisical but no one knows now what to do. Please try to spread the news. We feel abandon by AFGE. HELP
Post a response to this Blog
Hide Comments
|
Reader Comments
|
|
|
Author: Ted Riggs, of Local 2065, on
Feb 22, 2008 11:18 PM
Hey Jason, why don't you stand up and become a Union Steward and get the job done. Start filing those ULPs and taking issues up through the chain of command.
Post a response to this comment
|
|
Author: Gregorio A West, of Local 56, on
Mar 13, 2008 9:39 PM
I strongly believe if your Commander cared about his employees along with other installation,he should follow suit and wait for the revised new AR 190-56. I had asked my LTC,COL why is it that you have a alternate PAT and we civilians dont have one,it appears to me that as a civilian we hold a higher standard than the military since we dont have on alternate PT test,for age or gender. He was not happy with my comments. `
Post a response to this comment
|
Author: Shawn M Janson, of Local 2104, on
Mar 29, 2008 1:45 PM
Just had a big break in the AR 190-56, are physicals have be stopped and the PT test has been stopped!!! We also got a draft of the NEW AR 190-56!!!!
Post a response to this comment
|
Author: paul rhodes on
Oct 1, 2009 11:18 AM
Shawn M Janson,can you e-mail me a copy of the new ar 190-56, i can not find it
Post a response to this comment
|
|
Author: Henry Craig on
Apr 1, 2008 12:42 AM
Ar 190-56 Requires that All Police /Guards be able to wear a resperator.
Tb Med 502 and OSHA states that if an individual is required to wear a negitive pressure resperator and medically can not the Organization is required to provide a positive pressure resperator (PAPR).NIOSH approved CBRN PAPR do exist.
If anyone is losing their job because of this requirement then the organization is in Violation of Federal regulation.
Post a response to this comment
|
Author: Hidding from theboss on
Sep 3, 2008 9:10 AM
Here is some Ammo for your fight
nlecac.org/index_files/NLECAC-190-56.pdf
Post a response to this comment
|
|
Author: K Janson on
Jan 4, 2009 7:25 PM
I am so sorry this is not a place I should be leaving you a message, but I am only able to find you here. Will you please contact me kim360@comcast.net. Thank you and again I am sorry about leaving this message in here. I really hope you do not get into any kind of trouble for this.
Post a response to this comment
|
|
Hide Comments
